<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ETBlogs MVSports - Latest Comments in Enough already with the pick and roll</title><link>http://etblogs-mvsports.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://etblogs-mvsports.disqus.com/enough_already_with_the_pick_and_roll/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:59:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Enough already with the pick and roll</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/mvsports/2008/03/26/enough-already-with-the-pick-and-roll/#comment-5697898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love the theory, Joe. But 33-5???&lt;br&gt;20-17 is one thing, but 33-5??? when a team like Xavier is touted for its tight defense???&lt;br&gt;Don't be so naive big guy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hector Longo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enough already with the pick and roll</title><link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/mvsports/2008/03/26/enough-already-with-the-pick-and-roll/#comment-5697897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe one team goes to the line more than the other because it commits more fouls?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just a theory.  Since when does number of foul shots prove anything other than number of fouls/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Dunskirmane</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:20:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>